Is the problem our rural roads? Or our drivers?
When I heard about the crash on “roller coaster road” that killed two young people, I thought: Oh, no. Not again.
I’ve been driving Dry Ridge Road in Woodford County for more than 30 years, usually while squeezing the steering wheel and hoping somebody wouldn’t pop over a hill and hit me head-on.
At least 10 people have died in five accidents on that three-mile ribbon of pavement since 1984, according to the Herald-Leader archives.
My first thought: Something should be done about that road.
My second thought: The road isn’t the problem.
I drove out there Thursday morning, just after the daily parade of commuters who use Dry Ridge as a shortcut from south Lexington to the Bluegrass Parkway and Frankfort.
Friends of Hannah Landers, 17, a Dunbar High School senior, and Ben Thompson, 22, of Wilmore, had put up two white crosses to remember them. The crosses were in front of a big, skinned-up tree at the end of muddy skid marks. It was where the 2007 Suzuki Reno carrying them and two other young people crashed late Monday morning.
The four apparently had gone joy riding on Dry Ridge, where if you drive too fast you can leave the pavement for a few seconds - or forever.
There were two bouquets of flowers, and a yellow ribbon was tied around the tree. On the ground beside the tree was a journal, wet from rain. It had a few pictures of the smiling young people, sweet notes and many pages that will never be filled.
The memorial is less than a mile from four other white crosses. They are nailed to a tree where a van crashed in September 1999, killing three tobacco workers and a 5-year-old boy. Speed and alcohol were factors in that crash.
As Kentucky country roads go, Dry Ridge is in good shape - 20 feet wide with solid grass shoulders. It was resurfaced and restriped two years ago, and 45 mph speed limit signs are posted in several places.
“If you drive the speed limit, it’s a pretty safe road,” said Buan Smith, Woodford County’s highway engineer. “But people drive quite fast. You can see where they’ve bottomed out jumping some of the hills.”
Wilbur Hill has lived and farmed on Dry Ridge Road since 1944. He agrees it’s a good road. But he has seen a lot of tragedy.
“My son pulled some girls out of a car one time at the same tree where those kids were killed,” Hill said. “We had another young man got killed just beyond our driveway, about 20 years ago. My boys were out that night, and it scared me to death.”
While he sees occasional joy riders - “The kids get reckless and like to get airborne” - he is more concerned about the commuters who zip by every morning and evening, going 10 or 20 mph over the speed limit and paying little attention to the double-yellow line.
“It’s the same cars every day,” he said. “People aren’t careful enough; they don’t anticipate the curves and hills. They’ve posted the speed limit several places, but that doesn’t slow them down.”
Kentuckians love their blacktop. Usually, our first reaction to a tragic wreck is to say the road needs to be wider, flatter, straighter. We’re always eager to four-lane the most scenic of rural roads, whether it needs it or not.
There are more sensible reactions.
We could warn our kids about the dangers of joy riding. Still, the smartest kids will do the dumbest things. Always have, always will.
But teenagers aren’t the main problem.
Kentuckians of all ages drive too fast on country roads that were designed a century or two ago for horses and wagons, not Dodge Ram pickups and Escalades.
Rural roads should be well-built and maintained, just as Dry Ridge Road is.
Beyond that, we have two choices: We can spend all of our resources flattening, straightening and four-laning Kentucky into asphalt ugliness, or we can slow down and be more careful.
Something should be done, and I think you know what it is.


May 9, 2008 at 8:19 am
Why wasn’t she in school?
May 9, 2008 at 11:41 am
I heartily agree that speed and not the road itself was the major contributor to this tragedy. However, certainly there were other factors involved. First, there was the “driving while distracted” issue. I heard on the radio yesterday that driving distractions contributed to 87% of all teen driving deaths (and there were 6000 or so last year). Distractions include not only iPods, cell phones, and the radio, but also the other people in the car. Secondly, there is lack of experience and training. As none of the public schools offer driver’s education any more, teens learn to drive largely from their parents — and judging from the quality of the drivers out there, teenagers might not be learning the best driving habits. Moreover, outside of the state-mandated 4 hour safe driving classroom course, the state requires no other driver training. It also relies on parents to be honest when certifiying the amount of time their children have had behind the wheel. While the graduated licensing scheme is certainly better than the previous program, this is one of its critical flaws. How many people are not truthful and simply sign off on the 60 hours after their kids have had their permits for 6 months just because they are anxious to get their kids behind the wheel and out of their hair? It is true that there are driving schools in the area, but my experience with them is that (1) they are only 6 hours long; (2) they concentrate solely on the skills necessary to pass the driving test; and (3) they cost about $55/hour, a rate certainly not affordable by many famlies. Moreover, the skills they teach are are very different from those needed to travel our roads on a regular basis.
I have a son who is a junior at Dunbar, and he didn’t get his permit until September, after he turned 17. Although he was eligible to get his license last March, we felt he needed a lot more driving experience in different sorts of conditions — such as rural roads, traffic bottlenecks, driving rain, etc. We will not let him get his license until he has more experience behind the wheel and truly comprehends the dangers of getting behind the wheel of a 2-3000 lb. gas-powered machine. Unfortunately, we have been able to use this accident as an example of the potential tragic result of speed, distractions, and lack of driving experience.
One more thing — I hope that parents use this tragedy, as well, to impress upon their kids how important it is that they know where their kids are, even if it’s not where they are supposed to be. I don’t know if Hannah’s parents were aware that she was not at school or at her volunteer job but was out with friends. If they were not, I feel even more badly for them. If I had the misfortunate to be in their position, I don’t think I could keep myself from being angry at my child for not being where I had thought she was, and for doing something without my permission. And I would have a hard time not letting that anger interfere with my grieiving process.
May 9, 2008 at 12:15 pm
Why she wasn’t in school isn’t the issue here - not by miles.
May 9, 2008 at 5:57 pm
Yeah, it does matter. If she was supposed to be in school, and she wasn’t, this wouldn’t have happened.
May 10, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Tom, I think you’re correct. If people will slow down and quit being in such a hurry to get everywhere (or just playing around to see how fast they can go and hit a hump in the road to see if they can “fly” or not), then these things would drop dramatically, and deaths in our state would drop dramatically. I agree quite a bit with Nancy that if parents are the ones responsible to teach our kids to drive, and a lot of them are terrible drivers, we’re just perpetuating the cycle by creating more terrible drivers and are killing them in the process. We need mandated driver’s education in schools again, and we need certified instructors, not just someone with a teaching certificate who can’t drive either to teach the kids…rather someone with hundreds of thousands of accident-free miles and lots of real world and simulated training to teach them. I think again you would see a real decrease in fatalities (more over the long term than short term) and better drivers overall if we did this.